In 1989 I published a special issue on the “End of The World or the End
of an Illusion?” when I published a magazine called Critique: Exposing
Consensus Reality. After re-reading it for this current issue I wish I
had copies of it to give away. I wish it were online so people could
see how I treated the subject back then, with humor, intellectual
rigor, sarcasm, anecdotal stories of previous end of the world times
and parties where no one was allowed to wear watches. It was fun albeit
serious. I was tempted to hijack many of those articles for this issue
to convey that things have not changed much. We have the same
prophecies, perhaps different students of the Apocalypse and new
writers following the same lineage (i.e., we now have Daniel Pinchbeck
rather than Terrence McKenna). But perhaps time is not linear,
evolution is not sequential. Perhaps it’s cyclical... we keep repeating
the same story, our fear of the end of the world or of our own death
being a main motivator for human behavior, whether the material was
published in 1989 or 2007.
The fact is we are getting closer to incredible, unprecedented
upheavals. With global warming, peak oil and an insane deficit (we owe
the Chinese 200 billion dollars), things are not looking bright. One
can get excited about the recent elections, but I don’t. Not at all. We
are not making the changes that we desperately need to turn this nation
around. However, if you want band-aid remedies you will accept band-aid
solutions. Remember Einstein’s words, that we cannot change anything if
we are still treating problems within the same mental landscape that
created the problem.
I really think we are in for rough times, inevitably (we already are!).
Look at our personal lives: does each of us make changes because we
want to? We often assume that societal changes can happen overnight but
it’s okay to overlook our personal transformation. They are intimately
connected.
Or do we wait until the pain becomes so unbearable that change appears
to be the only option, or death, thus the bumper sticker, “Evolve or
Die!” I was reading the other day that often enlightenment is preceded
by a “dark night of the soul.”
With all this talk of doom and gloom, there is simultaneously talk
about an evolutionary leap or a radical transformation of consciousness
(see the film reviews of “2012 The Odyssey,” “Humanity Ascending,” and
the reprint from Jan Frazier’s new book. Even futurist Barbara Marx
Hubbard has “surrendered” to an unknowing: “Something beyond all of us
is guiding the change we are passing through, and we have no choice or
say in that. Our only responsibility is to surrender, and to allow it
to do its work. Humanity is going through an evolutionary leap we have
never dreamed of, but neither you nor I can stop it or help it. I have
surrendered.”
So, this issue is typical of our issues in that it is an attempt to
give a balance of perspectives. We have the doomers for sure. How could
we not use them for a special issue like this? We also include the
change agents, the pioneers, the risk takers, the visionaries who see
something that most of us can’t clearly see (yet). Many of us have our
pet solutions, whether it’s personal or societal. Some talk about
personal enlightenment, some speak of getting to the core beliefs of
why we are in the mess we are in. Some speak of city-repair-type
solutions, where our neighborhoods can become the model for relocalized
village life where true homeland security can reside, along with our
basic needs filled, for food, shelter, energy, water, entertainment,
humor, community and love. Some talk about the coming
refugee/concentration camps.
As I peruse this issue and its contents I am reminded of what Francis
Moore Lappe said, things are getting better and things are getting
worse. Similar to Charles Dickens more than a hundred years ago, who
began his “Tale of Two Cities”: “It was the best of times; it was the
worst of times.”
The point is, do we know enough bad news to get off our asses and
become a movement working for radical solutions or do we need more bad
news before we will act? Do “information” and “news” really matter at
all?
What does it take? A divorce, job loss, accident, loss of a loved one?
If it takes painful loss for us to change personally, can you imagine
what type of pain the political system will have to endure before it
changes?
Or do we really not know where to start? HopeDance readers have been
inundated with solutionary activities (for ten years, yes we are
celebrating ten years!). They cannot possibly declare with shrugged
shoulders, “I don’t know what to do.”
Do we simply do what we can, with our hearts opened and our minds
stretched to include both sacred vision and practical commitment to
make use of our short time here? Or do we do more work on ourselves so
we stop polluting the world with our neuroses? Or do we incrementally
remove ourselves from the corporate culture and its violent, seductive
virus of enchantment and start becoming authentic change-makers? Do we
become more divisive or more collaborative? Do we become haughty or
surrender to the present moment that contains its own seed for
enlightenment, attention and radical change?
I invite you to read the articles that draw you in. Listen to what your
heart is calling for. If you need to take ayahuasca, go for it. If you
need to know more bad news, go for it. If you need to reduce your
workload so you can co-create that ecovillage you’ve been talking about
for years, go for it. I’m declaring the year 2007 the year for
collaboration (for films, projects, grants, special issues, etc.)
We cannot afford to let the few activists and concerned citizens do
more and more. We need more people coming out of the woodwork to help
with matters to aid various projects and campaigns.
With this issue, we have initiated a 12-page film&book&music
review pullout. Freelancer Shawna Galassi is now editor of that
section, to get more and more people to the films, not only to educate
ourselves on various issues but to take action (both personal and
political), no matter how small.
Sonoma County is taking a respite. It became an example of too few
people doing too much with not enough results. Hopefully they can get
back on board. Thank you Gina for all your hard work in making it
happen.
Our 7 min film documentary is now on googlevideo
[http://tinyurl.com/y6zc9m ] thanks to volunteer Roberto Monge. A better
quality version will be on our website soon. Mendocino County is
seriously coming on board, so watch for details. Santa Barbara
distribution and editorship is going through changes, so please bear
with us. If you wish to write or deliver papers in that area, please
contact us. We might be separating Ojai and Ventura, giving them each a
voice; call for more information.
The next issue will be a collaboration of various government agencies
related to TRANSPORTATION so the issue will contain info and news about
the coolest things that are happening in our cities related to our
transportation needs.
I want to thank the following people for coming through to help out
with the essential needs of keeping this experiment called HopeDance
alive: Carolyn, Rosemary, Paula, Lisa, Woody, JC, Doug, Wes, Barbara,
Roberto, Shawna, and Cameron. Without passionate people involved,
HopeDance would just wither away.
Bob Banner, Publisher









