Making the Most of a Global Depression Print E-mail
By Richard Heinberg, Senior Fellow, Post Carbon Institute

It’s becoming increasingly likely that 2008 will go down in history as the year the Second Great Depression began. The unraveling started with the subprime mortgage fiasco and is spreading fast. The total value of all US$-based mortgage bonds is $10.4 trillion, of which 30 percent is now expected to be lost in defaults and property devaluation. That’s $3.2 trillion in losses. Trillions more are likely to evaporate from the related derivatives markets. It’s true that the global economy is pretty big, and a few hundred billion get lost under sofa cushions from time to time (as happened during the savings and loan crisis of the 1990s), and still, life goes on. But when we’re discussing trillions of dollars (with a “T”), we’re talking real money.

Get ready for bank runs, a stock market collapse, and, perhaps, a money panic.

Such things have happened before (in 1833, 1837, 1857, 1907, 1920, and 1929), but this time it’s different. Now the problem is not just financial mismanagement; there is a deeper instability: the global economy is based on a fundamentally unsustainable exploitation of depleting natural resources, and that whole system is teetering. In his essay, “Barreling into Recession: How Oil Burst the American Bubble,” Michael Klare points out that “The economic bubble that lifted the stock market to dizzying heights was sustained as much by cheap oil as by cheap (often fraudulent) mortgages.” Veteran geologist Colin Campbell, in his ASPO Newsletter #86, steps back for an even broader overview:

“The Oil Age opened 150 years ago, releasing a flood of cheap energy, such that today’s production is equivalent in energy terms to 22 billion slaves working around the clock. The resulting economic prosperity allowed the banks to lend more than they had on deposit, confident that Tomorrow’s Expansion was collateral for To-day’s Debt. It sounds a rather dubious principle but worked well enough during the First Half of the Oil Age allowing at least some countries to reap great prosperity. The Second Half now dawns, and being characterized by falling supply, effectively removes the Collateral for debt. . . . Whereas the post-peak physical decline of oil . . . is only gradual, . . . the perception that past economic growth must now give way to contraction can come in an instant, prompting radical changes in the financial world.”

So, as the oil drains away, the view is all downhill from here. A Depression is, well, depressing even to think about, much less to live through.

But wait a moment. For anyone with an ecological sensibility, the prospect of economic contraction has a silver lining. In a recent e-mail message, UBC Professor of Human Ecology Bill Rees summed up our collective situation this way:
 
“To raise the human enterprise ever further from thermodynamic equilibrium, we must degrade and dissipate ever-greater quantities of available energy and material resources extracted from the ecosphere. We have passed the point where the ecosphere can provide sustainably all that we are extracting. Resources are depleted; entropy accumulates. In effect, techno-industrial society has become pathologically parasitic on nature.”

The implication is clear: if we hope to survive as a species, and if there is to be hope for millions of other creatures, we need to shrink the human enterprise. Economic contraction may be bitter medicine, but it’s part of the cure for what ails our planetary home.

However, we can manage this contraction either foolishly or intelligently.

A foolish management of economic contraction would entail burning the biosphere for alternative fuels; propping up the banks and other financial institutions that created the mortgage mess, without ever re-examining the wisdom of growth-based economics; and responding to human privation and misery with repression and war.

Intelligent management would start with an explicit commitment to redesign the global economy to run with less. We would assess ecosphere resources and identify a humane, equitable path toward gradual reduction in population and total consumption levels. We would focus on those aspects of life that bring us increasing satisfaction without requiring more inputs of energy and materials. We would re-acquaint ourselves with the values and virtues of community, self-sufficiency, and modesty. We would redesign our cities to eliminate cars, while developing renewable energy sources and educating a new generation of ecological farmers.

If we handle this well, the medicine of contraction will leave Nature intact and humanity in a state of greater happiness, equity, and peace.

We don’t have much choice regarding whether a Depression will ensue. But a great deal depends on how we respond. It’s not too soon to start that discussion.

Richard Heinberg is the author of The Party’s Over and Peak Everything. He is a Senior Fellow of the Post Carbon Institute and lectures widely on sane responses to fossil fuel depletion.

Comments
Add NewSearch
Ray Bane - Cultural Anthropologist - reti   | 207.200.116.13 | 2008-03-18 21:51:31
Your article paints a picture that I have been fortunate to have experienced. Beginning in 1961, wife and I lived with Alaska Eskimos and Indians for a total of roughly 25 years. This included conducting cultural research into traditional Native subsistence. We shared their lifestyle learning to rely on the natural environment for our sustenance. It was not an easy life, but it was satifying. Much of the time we did without electricity, indoor plumbing, tv, roads, etc. However, I did learn critical importance of being part of a cooperative social group. My Eskimos and Indians companions were not loners. They cared for one another and shared whatever they had. Learning how to grow or find your own food and aquiring other basic skills is not enough. You must find others with who you can share the challenges the future will soon present to all of us.
Lee Bentley   | 216.184.30.44 | 2008-03-19 14:49:48
Re Ray Banes comments on living with the natives. I have lived as a neighbor to the Indians of New Mexico for 30 years and your observations are exactly what I have seen. Cooperation is the key skill to survival, an optimistic good natured outlook helps also.
RICHARD RALPH ROEHL (R.R.R.) - Progress or Cancer?   | 71.98.175.125 | 2008-03-19 12:43:49
You conveniently sidestepped the biggest elephant in the room. And this elephant is the relentless out-of-control growth of the human population on Planet Over-Birth Earth. Relentless growth isn't progress. It is cancer.
jerry - Nature   | 65.68.72.123 | 2008-03-19 16:50:15
The next pandemic will solve this problem.
charles kuchar - retired   | 63.230.46.6 | 2008-03-19 19:56:18
i agree with most of your post except for the requirement of reducing population. the population of earth could increase ten-fold without any problems if life changes to an alternate way of living. example, india has over a billion people and food enough to go around, even without eating the beef. the gas-eating civilized world has to do the changing and the depression will make it possible. charlie
Guy Fox - Denial   | 71.98.175.125 | 2008-03-19 20:34:14
India has some extremely serious problems... beginning with the dubious distinction of becoming more populous that it's neighbor, China, before 2015. 70% of the people in India live in terrible poverty. They have very critical problems growing enough major food commodities such as wheat to sustain their population... and the dearth of water for crop use being only one problem. Because of drought in India and China they have had to import large amount of wheat and other staples... which is why the commodity prices on the world market for wheat have gone UP from historic highs almost 300% in the last few months! Where did you go to school? Was it in the $tate of deny-all?
dystopnik - realist   | 76.180.64.241 | 2008-03-19 23:43:50
Over-populated countries can only remain that way because of petro-input fertilizers and other unsustainable inputs.

Without the oil flowing, those populations will crash bigtime....HARD
The smart creature - After the energy-production pe     | 87.90.240.254 | 2008-03-21 10:10:51
Your analysis appears quite correct : the present financial bubble has been built after sixty years of fast economic growth allowed by energy 1/produced at low cost 2/ sold at a cheap price and 3/ satisfying a growing demand. But as the average cost of producing energy rises, growth will get slower and slower and this bubble will probably become more and more unstable until it finally implodes.As you say the implication is clear : if we hope to survive as a species we need to shrink the global human enterprise. Economic contraction will happen (sooner or later) and we must prepare for this happening.

http://thesmartcreature.blogspot.com/
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
Security Image
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.

 
< Prev   Next >